Effect on Children
There’s a lot of research out these days on children of divorce after they grow up. However, if you review some of the key research published regarding adjustment of children during and soon after a divorce, you’ll find a lot of confusion. Some of it stems from the confusion that occurs between the child’s age at the divorce and the child’s age when problems develop. A child at age 12 who experienced his parents’ divorce at age six is different from a child of age 12 who is now going through his parents’ divorce. Thus, studying 12 year old children of divorce is not as simple as it may appear.
The data is inconclusive as to whether young children are at a greater risk for adjustment problems, but they clearly are harmed by it as much as older children are. Divorce does not appear to have consistent effects across all children and across all ages. Older children may be more sensitive to family conflict and feel more pressure to intervene, which could increase their risk for problems, but they also have more emotional resources to help them cope, which could decrease their risk. Younger children may have less ability to sense and intervene to stop arguments, possibly leading to less risk, but they also have fewer cognitive resources to make sense of events and emotions, possibly leading to higher risks. Thus, determining how any specific child will deal with a divorce entails understanding that child’s strengths and the demands of the specific situation.
Some of what we do know about children and divorce could be summarized as follows:
|Effects of Parental Divorce on Children of Varying Ages|
|Age at Time of Divorce||Initial Reactions||Later Reactions (2 to 10 years)|
(2.5 to 6 years)
|Are much more likely to blame themselves for the divorce; also likely to fear abandonment by the remaining parent. They may be confused, have fantasizes about reconciliation, and show difficulties in expressing their feelings. Early studies showed that boys had more problems than girls, but later studies have not confirmed this; rather, boys and girls have different kinds of problems as a result of the divorce||Are more likely to have fewer memories of either their own or their parents’ earlier conflict; generally close to custodial parent and a competent step-parent. May feel anger at an unavailable non-custodial parent that prevents a strong adult relationship|
(7 to 12 years)
|Tend to express feelings of sadness, fear, and anger. They are less likely to blame themselves, but more likely to feel divided loyalties. They are better able to use extra-familial support. There is some support for placing children with their same-sex parent for best adjustment||Tend to have the most difficulties in adapting to step-parenting and remarriage; may challenge family rules and regulations, and throw back “You’re not my real father/mother” during conflict. They tend to show decreased academic performance and disturbed peer relations|
(13 to 18 years)
|Show difficulty coping with anger, outrage, shame, and sadness; they are more likely to reexamine their own values, and may disengage from the family to do this||Shares feelings of the 7 to 12 group but may not be able to express them. May fear long-term relationships with others, and show adjustment difficulties such as running away, truancy, and delinquency|
Sources: Kelly, 1998; Amato, 1993; Hetherington, 1991; Wallerstein, 1991; Wallerstein and Blakeslee, 1989
Other studies have shown that problems resulting from the divorce last into adulthood, and often lead to poorer romantic relationships. It may be the stress of the childhood relationships to divorced parents, the expectation that marriages can easily end in divorce, or the loss of a close and confiding relationship with two parents who have made a marriage work that account for these findings.
It should also be noted that these results do not indicate that divorce per se is the main cause of childhood problems in divorced families. In fact, among families high on conflict, divorced families, and “normal” families, the married and in conflict families showed more child adjustment problems than the divorced families. Other studies have shown about half of the behavioral, achievement, and emotional problems seen in boys from divorced families could be identified as early as four year prior to the divorce. Girls showed weaker but similar findings. Thus, the same factors that led to the divorce have likely already had a negative impact on children when the divorce actually occurs.
There seem to be three key areas to understanding how children will adjust in any specific case. These three areas are each discussed below.
Whiteside and Becker, in the March 2000 Journal of Family Psychology, note that what seems to matter most is helping children adjust in the two years after the divorce is for the children to experience an Authoritative style of parenting. Authoritative parents are able to provide structure for their children, but still remain flexible; they can allow the children to make some decisions on their own, while still maintaining parental control over the situation. This kind of parenting is marked by good flexibility but good consistency, coupled with emotional warmth. Research has generally found this to be the most effective kind of parenting. Parents showing an Authoritative Style are also more likely to show more active coping behaviors, feel more self-efficacy, and seek out and receive more social support.
Bray and Kelly discuss several very important considerations to helping children adjust after divorce:
- The child must be able to move between the custodial and non-residential parent’s homes without guilt. This means no dirty looks or conflict about the visit. Unless this begins early on, it will be difficult to establish the child’s connection to the non-residential parent as “safe” to continue. Conflicts and arguments over holiday visits, “idealizing” the other parent and announcing a desire to live with them during conflict, and resentment of the step-father are less likely to happen too.
- The two parents must respect each other’s rules and values. While they may not have been able to agree in marriage, they must be able to do so in divorce. A consistent bedtime, and rules about off-limit foods and television shows, indicates to a child that their world is still stable and dependable.
- Sandler and colleagues found that maintaining the number of positive events in the child’s life (for example, involvement in after-school activities) is crucial in predicting good adjustment after divorce. They offer that stable events and schedules help the child feel their world is predictable and dependable. Although parents may feel and think differently, increases in positive events, such as increased recreational time with father (e.g., “Disneyland Dads”) did not necessarily lead to better adjustment in children.
- Parents must not fight in front of the children. Increasing arguments between parents is one of the negative events that Sandler and colleagues found to predict poor adjustment after divorce. This is articulated in more detail below.
The attachment between both the custodial and non-custodial parent and child can suffer as a result of the emotional negativity, inconsistent structure within and across homes, and rejection and loss that often occur soon after divorce. Several attachment styles can be seen:
- Secure Attachment – These children show fewer adjustment problems; however, these children have typically received more consistent and developmentally appropriate parenting for most of their life. The parents of securely attached children likely are better able to maintain these aspects of parenting through the divorce. Given that the family factors that lead to divorce also impact the children, there could be fewer securely attached children in divorcing families.
- Insecure/Avoidant Attachment These children become anxious, clinging, and angry with the parent. These children typically come from families with adults who were also insecurely attached to their families, and were thus unable to provide the kind of consistency, emotional responsiveness, and care that securely attached parents could offer. Such parents have a more difficult time with the divorce, and are more likely to become rejecting, in the ways noted above.
- Insecure/Ambivalent Attachment These children generally are raised with disorganized, neglecting, and inattentive parenting. The parents are even less able to provide stability and psychological strength for them after a divorce, and as a result the children are even more prone to become clinging but inconsolable in their distress, as well as to act out, suffer mood swings, and become oversensitive to stress.
Parents of both the Avoidant and Ambivalent children can, after the stress of a difficult marriage and/or divorce, turn to their children for emotional support. The children may offer it, and become enmeshed in their parent’s emotional world and more sensitive to emotional distress. Alternately, they may reject the parent and try to disconnect themselves from the family as much as possible. This leads them to have the same kind of distant and uninvolved relationship as their parents had with their own family.
The third key area to understand how children adjust to divorce is the issue of parental conflict. Children need supportive co-parenting; this means that parents must cooperate sufficiently well to see that the children’s needs are met. The children do not need parents who fight and argue with each other in front of the children, or fight “through the children” by, for example, criticizing the absent parent in front of the children, or offering the damning comment, “You’re just like your Father/Mother.” Since the custodial parent has “expelled” the absent parent from their life for being “bad,” at least in the child’s mind, it stands to reason that the child too could be “bad” and be expelled from the home as well.
One study cited by Cummings and Davies found that 66% of parental interactions after the divorce were marked by anger and conflict. Kelly noted that conflict drops significantly after the first two years for most divorced families, but for another 25% the level of stress after two years remains very close to the level of distress soon after the divorce. Witnessing conflict between the parents is very disruptive to children’s adjustment. Children exposed to conflict are more likely to have behavioral and emotional disturbances, suffer social and interpersonal problems, and show impairment in their thought and reasoning processes. Studies dating back to the 1930’s have consistently shown this. Cummings and Davies cite numerous studies showing how prolonged marital conflict, as opposed to short-term conflict in times of short-term stress, is a very good predictor of child behavior problems. The power of the predictor grows after divorce; that is to say, parental conflict is more likely to lead to emotional and behavioral problems, and after a divorce is much more likely to result in such problems. When conflict escalates to physical levels, the children are 500% to 600% more likely to have severe behavioral problems, and much more likely to be abused themselves.
Why would conflict, even only verbal conflict, produce these kinds of results? Children are exposed to all sorts of emotions during conflict, such as anger, apathy, and alienation. Children are like sponges in some ways, and easily “soak up” the emotions around them, especially when the arguments center on them, their behavior, and their needs. They become overwhelmed and confused, and may feel a need to side with one parent or intervene to stop the arguing. This is more likely when arguments quickly escalate from small quibbles to huge fights. Their adrenaline levels are elevated, their heart rate increases, and their blood pressure rises. As noted, when depression or alcohol use in a parent reaches clinically significant levels, serious problems become much more likely.
When the parents show better emotional adjustment after the divorce, so do the children. Parents are better able to maintain consistent structure in the children’s lives, respond to their dejection, resentment, and confusion promptly and clearly. When parents are able to argue over some child-rearing issue, reach an agreement, and stick to the compromise, children show much less anxiety, insecurity, and distress. It is as if the two “pillars” that support their world remain steady this way.
Children from higher SES families also showed better adjustment. It would appear that adequate financial support can have a buffering effect. Put another way, higher SES families don’t have the additional stress that a lower standard of living can cause, and may be able to use financial resources to free up more time to heal through rituals (e.g., Friday night movies and pizza), greater exposure to extended family, etc…. It may be that having more financial resources, vacation time, etc… makes it easier for the children to spend time with each parent, and for the parents to get psychological help when needed.
So what makes conflict OK? How do you manage conflict? Cummings and Davies offer the following points to consider.
- Anger and Conflict Are Normal
- Seeing the parents resolve problems and disagreements, and recover from angry exchanges may be helpful to children.
- What may be most harmful are repeated, and more frequent, angry and conflicted exchanges that do not lead to resolution and greater peace. These can be especially nasty when they include name-calling, “kitchen sinking” (throwing every complaint you can come up with into the argument), and revealing buried resentments in a moment of anger.
- This may even be compounded by high levels of conflict that existed in the family before the divorce. In high conflict families, the children become sensitized to anger and conflict, and thus are “hypersensitive” to it. Worst of all, however, is clearly verbal aggression that turns physical. Research has linked this to the greatest degree of behavioral and emotional problems.
- Parents should argue to work out differences when necessary, but also include resolution, and even apologies (a simple, “I’m sorry” from both will do) in front of the children to let them know all is well again. Arguments resolved behind closed doors can still communicate resolution if the hostility is gone and some sign of affection is exchanged in front of the children. Explanation of the fight when possible and appropriate can also be helpful.
- Children are Sensitive to Conflict
- Children are sensitive to the conflict in the marriage, and after a divorce may become even more sensitive to it, especially if the children have shown attachment problems or begin to show attachment problems with the absent parent.
- They may also suffer from role reversals with their parents and social problems with their peers because of their difficulty regulating their emotions. It is as if they exert all their emotional control in the home, and have little left for the school and playground.
- Some people mistake “conflict” for “yelling and hollering.” The “cold silent treatment” is just as obvious to children, since parents who suddenly do not speak to each other, or who are no longer affectionate with each other mark a significant change in a child’s eyes. Some argue this kind of conflict is actually worse for children than open arguments; an open argument can be resolved, but a quiet, subtle war does not appear resolved.
- Children of Different Ages Respond in Different Ways
- Very young children become distressed and may cry, express fear, or show anxiety. They may have nightmares, engage in regressive behavior, and appear to “back up” to a much younger age. They are less likely to intervene to stop parents, but more likely to try to distract them from fighting with needy or inappropriate behavior, or to withdraw and become dejected.
- At age five or six, children begin to intervene directly, expressing desires that parents stop, or that the arguing makes them unhappy. They may become “little adults” in an effort to stabilize the family as well, but it unclear as to how much this predisposes them to suffer emotional problems in later life. They may be more likely to become enmeshed and experience reversal of roles and social problems, as noted above.
- Teens may be more likely to mediate, and may also become more distressed because they can realize more completely the severity of arguments.
- Boys and Girls Respond Differently
- Younger boys may show more acting out, aggressive, and “hyperactive behavior.” Girls may show more withdrawing and dejection, or “little adult” behavior that is unlikely to draw the same level of attention that a boy’s wild and uncontrolled behavior does.
- Around the teen years, girls may report feeling more anger and boys more sadness.
So how do you argue effectively? McKay and colleagues offer these points:
- Express Your Needs Clearly
You do this by focusing on single issues and presenting just the facts, leaving out attacks on your ex-partner’s character or behavior
- Example: “I’m going back to school in the fall. Child care will be $650 a month”
- Not: “I know you don’t give a damn about who keeps the kids, but you’re going to have to pay day care expenses”
- State your feelings in straight-forward “I” language.
Focus on the immediate situation, and don’t bring up old feelings and hurts from the past. Don’t make below the belt comments to emotionally bash the other person into doing what you want
- Example: “I’m scared to think about how I’ll come up with the money to pay for all of it”
- Not: “If you think I’m begging you for the money, I’m not; you’re just going to have pay your part and that’s it”
- State your wants clearly too.
This includes what you are willing to offer in return. Good timing is sometimes everything
- Example: “I want you to pay half. Then, after I finish school and make more money, you can cut back on the child support you pay”
- Not: “You owe me $325 a month starting now”
- Practice and Rehearse
Try out what you plan to say with someone objective, and listen to their pointers on how to rephrase or clarify. Practice being calm while they throw angry comments at you if you want
Whiteside and Becker conclude: