Intro
  Why Do Some Groups Score Differently?

What Should We Do About Group Differences?
  Proponents of Herrnstein and Murray

Opponents of Herrnstein and Murray 1

Opponents of Herrnstein and Murray 2

Opponents of Herrnstein and Murray 3
So Where Does This Leave Us?
So Where Does This Leave Us?

Are IQ Tests Biased?

Are IQ Tests Biased?

In closing, I would offer two thoughts for consideration.

First, I thought this quote by Weinert and Hany (2003), after a 25 year longitudinal study of intelligence in adults, was a good summary:


 

"For each phase of life, we can say that, given otherwise equal conditions, those blessed with better cognitive abilities profit both more quantitatively and qualitatively from the stimulation and instructions in their environment (e.g., in school) that those with less favorable abilities.

In our societies, those who possess better intellectual abilities and have received better education generally reach greater opportunities to gain an occupational and social position that provides additional cognitive stimulation in turn.

Those who are more intelligent and more successful in their careers often develop a greater degree of self-confidence. As a result, they are willing to invest more effort in solving difficult problems, thus increasing their probability of success."

 

Second, consider what it means that:

  • some argue that 50% of differences in intelligence are attributable to genes, and others resent this with the argument that it begins denigration of minority groups as inferior

  • Barkley (1999) offers that 80% of differences in attention and concentration are attributable to genes, and no one seems upset about this denigrating people with ADHD

  • some seek out a genetic cause for homosexuality with the argument that it could end the denigration of a minority group as inferior

What do you think?